View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sat Nov 01, 2014 1:43 am



Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
BKildahl - Analysis: 1771 v BKildahl (11/01/07) [17:38] 
Author Message
Video Manager

Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 6:17 pm
Posts: 524
Post BKildahl - Analysis: 1771 v BKildahl (11/01/07) [17:38]
Poster: BKildahl
Rating Class: Class A (1800-2000) | Videos Made: 63
Login or register to rate this video...
Not Rated Yet!

Video Tags: four pawns attack KID otb rnvr uscf

Video Download: Login or register to download this video for your iPhone/iPod Touch

Like (Login Required)
Liked By: spodgoon, Ruy Perez



Fri Nov 02, 2007 12:25 pm
Profile
Knight

Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 1:01 pm
Posts: 82
Post 
Yesterday i was having a look at Curtains's video of his game vs Tigrano (very interesting game in the Tarrasch) and I came across the game Pacheco-Schiller, in my database, which had a rather odd ending. This is the position with black to play:

Image

Here Schiller played: 70...Rh2?? Now white can win with the forced line 71. Na6+! Ka8 72. Nc7+ Ka7 73. Nb5+ Ka6 74. Ra7#

However Pacheco went: 71. Rg8+? Ka7 72. Rg1 Rh6+ 73. Kc7 Rh7+ 74. Nd7 Ka6 75. Rg5 giving the following position with black to play:

Image

Schiller now played: 75...Rh1?? But this allowed: 76. Nb8+! Ka7 77. Ra5#

so back to the original position:

Image

I think black can draw easily with several moves, but having played around with the position the thematic idea seems to be to check the king from a distance and when the king uses the Knight as a shield to pin the knight so it can't move. Schiller's method of trying to switch from checking at the rear to checking at the side doesn't work...

Here black's best move (I think) is 70...Rc2! pinning the knight. Then If the king moves black just checks.

Here's the second position:

Image

Black can still draw here using the same theme as before, but here all moves that release the pin on the Knight (such as Schillers ...Rh1) lose. ...Rf7 or ...Re7 both seem to draw.


Unfortunately my computer engine (somewhat ancient and no tablebase) is not much use in these positions since it thinks white is just 2 pawns up in all variations, so maybe I've missed some subtle resource. Would be interested in any comments.

_________________
Roq


Sat Nov 03, 2007 5:10 am
Profile
King

Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 7:07 pm
Posts: 398
Rating: 1902
Rating Class: Class A (1800-2000)
Post 
cool analysis and great game

_________________
draw? NO!!!!


Sat Nov 03, 2007 11:37 am
Profile ICQ
Live Commentary Messiah

Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:54 am
Posts: 389
Location: Worcester, MA
Rating Class: Class A (1800-2000)
Post 
Roq, I love that analysis, and your explanation of the drawing technique will be easy to remember. You just made me a better endgame player. Thanks!

Brett

_________________
USCF: 1957


Sun Nov 04, 2007 1:14 am
Profile ICQ
Knight

Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 1:01 pm
Posts: 82
Post 
Thanks Brett.

I really enjoy your videos - For my part I'm still working on trying to avoid umms and ahhs every other word (Watch this space!).

_________________
Roq


Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:59 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 5 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF