View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue Jun 18, 2013 3:56 pm



Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
positional puzzle 
Author Message
fluffy bunny
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 2:22 am
Posts: 546
Rating Class: Class A (1800-2000)
Post positional puzzle
This forum has very few positional puzzles, so I've decided to post one; the position is taken from a corr. game of mine.


white to move, how does white improve the position?

Image

If your a bit stuck, heres a Hint:

Hidden Text Below - [Show it] - [Hide it Again]




BIGGER HINT (its a hard puzzle afterall):



Hidden Text Below - [Show it] - [Hide it Again]





Okay, so if you have read the hints you should have lots of positional ideas by now...(if you didn't read the hints you should have some positional ideas anyway)


so comeon guys whats the first move? ...then whats the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th?


I haven't posted the awnser (yet) because I wanted to see other peoples opinions
on the position....I also want to see if any players fall into the trap thats lurking in the darkness (if I say anymore, I'll give it away)


Sat Dec 08, 2007 9:34 pm
Profile
Premium Member
Premium Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:24 pm
Posts: 2001
Location: Silicon Valley, California, USA
Rating: 1702 USCF
Rating Class: Class B (1600-1800)
Post 

Hidden Text Below - [Show it] - [Hide it Again]


_________________
I know you believe you understand what you think I just said, but you may not realize what I implied is not what you inferred.


Sat Dec 08, 2007 11:16 pm
Profile
fluffy bunny
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 2:22 am
Posts: 546
Rating Class: Class A (1800-2000)
Post 
Wildman wrote:

Hidden Text Below - [Show it] - [Hide it Again]



thats not the solution I have....

But I urge you to check your line with a computer... it may also work.


Sun Dec 09, 2007 11:03 am
Profile
Founder
Founder

Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 9:17 pm
Posts: 4712
Rating: 2073 USCF
Rating Class: Expert (2000-2200)
Post 
Initially, I was thinking about Wildman's solution, but now I'm looking for something else....

Actually, I can't come up with anything too strong other than the idea Wildman proposed. Maybe white could try:

Hidden Text Below - [Show it] - [Hide it Again]


_________________
FIDE 2118, USCF 2073.


Sun Dec 09, 2007 1:38 pm
Profile ICQ
fluffy bunny
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 2:22 am
Posts: 546
Rating Class: Class A (1800-2000)
Post 
JoshSpecht wrote:
Initially, I was thinking about Wildman's solution, but now I'm looking for something else....

Actually, I can't come up with anything too strong other than the idea Wildman proposed. Maybe white could try:

Hidden Text Below - [Show it] - [Hide it Again]




In the game I played ********, when I checked with the computer it turned out to be best so I didn't bother to look at what else I could have played.


so what i am trying to say is, both of your suggestions might work, but they (imo, and the opinion of crafty) not the strongest.


prepare to kick yourself.


Sun Dec 09, 2007 5:25 pm
Profile
Founder
Founder

Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 9:17 pm
Posts: 4712
Rating: 2073 USCF
Rating Class: Expert (2000-2200)
Post 
Positional puzzles = good. That being said, I'm still not sure what white's best plan is here.

But...

Hidden Text Below - [Show it] - [Hide it Again]


_________________
FIDE 2118, USCF 2073.


Sun Dec 09, 2007 8:37 pm
Profile ICQ
fluffy bunny
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 2:22 am
Posts: 546
Rating Class: Class A (1800-2000)
Post 
JoshSpecht wrote:
Positional puzzles = good. That being said, I'm still not sure what white's best plan is here.

But...

Hidden Text Below - [Show it] - [Hide it Again]




another "wrong" guess.


remember I wrote "I haven't posted the awnser (yet) because I wanted to see other peoples opinions
on the position....I also want to see if any players fall into the trap thats lurking in the darkness (if I say anymore, I'll give it away)"


well, allow me to anounce the trap that snared you.

this isn't a positional puzzle, I only told you that to see how you would respond.

the solution is completly 100% tactical, not only that it is completly crushing (+4 according to crafty)


It would seem that people act in the way that is expected of them, and not according to their own judgement.

If I now tell you the first move is

Hidden Text Below - [Show it] - [Hide it Again]

isn't the solution completly obvoius?


Sun Dec 09, 2007 10:13 pm
Profile
Founder
Founder

Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 9:17 pm
Posts: 4712
Rating: 2073 USCF
Rating Class: Expert (2000-2200)
Post 
Wow, I actually considered that but rejected it. Not sure if it was due to bad calculation or thinking I was looking for something "positional."

Actually, I think my mistake was looking for something here:

Hidden Text Below - [Show it] - [Hide it Again]



Of course I missed the line below, which became much more obvious after you posted the first move :)

Hidden Text Below - [Show it] - [Hide it Again]


_________________
FIDE 2118, USCF 2073.


Sun Dec 09, 2007 10:30 pm
Profile ICQ
fluffy bunny
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 2:22 am
Posts: 546
Rating Class: Class A (1800-2000)
Post 
JoshSpecht wrote:
Wow, I actually considered that but rejected it. Not sure if it was due to bad calculation or thinking I was looking for something "positional."

Actually, I think my mistake was looking for something here:

Hidden Text Below - [Show it] - [Hide it Again]



Of course I missed the line below, which became much more obvious after you posted the first move :)

Hidden Text Below - [Show it] - [Hide it Again]



correct! white creates threats all over the place which are simply unstoppable...


out of interest is turns out that White really didn't have a "bad move" in the position

Hidden Text Below - [Show it] - [Hide it Again]



funny this is, it doesn't "look" that strong.


Sun Dec 09, 2007 10:42 pm
Profile
Premium Member
Premium Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:24 pm
Posts: 2001
Location: Silicon Valley, California, USA
Rating: 1702 USCF
Rating Class: Class B (1600-1800)
Post 
FWIW, I launched Fritz 8 last night at 300 seconds -- it may still be running, I forgot to check this morning before going to work. Its first choice when I went to bed (after it ran for a couple of hours) was 1. Bxg4 with 1. Bxc4 as it's second choice. It's nice that Crafty thinks my 1. Nxf5 wasn't too bad and that aparently I'm not a total idiot...

L8erz...
=wild=

_________________
I know you believe you understand what you think I just said, but you may not realize what I implied is not what you inferred.


Mon Dec 10, 2007 1:30 pm
Profile
fluffy bunny
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 2:22 am
Posts: 546
Rating Class: Class A (1800-2000)
Post 
Wildman wrote:
FWIW, I launched Fritz 8 last night at 300 seconds -- it may still be running, I forgot to check this morning before going to work. Its first choice when I went to bed (after it ran for a couple of hours) was 1. Bxg4 with 1. Bxc4 as it's second choice. It's nice that Crafty thinks my 1. Nxf5 wasn't too bad and that aparently I'm not a total idiot...

L8erz...
=wild=


Interesting... what was eval for both?


Mon Dec 10, 2007 1:50 pm
Profile
Premium Member
Premium Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:24 pm
Posts: 2001
Location: Silicon Valley, California, USA
Rating: 1702 USCF
Rating Class: Class B (1600-1800)
Post 
Like I said, it was still running when I last looked. I'll try and remember to post it when I get home tonight if I have time. I do rememeber them being fairly close: something like 2.96 for one and 2.83 for the other -- take the numbers with a grain of salt since my memory has more holes than a block of Swiss cheese.

L8erz...
=wild=

_________________
I know you believe you understand what you think I just said, but you may not realize what I implied is not what you inferred.


Mon Dec 10, 2007 1:54 pm
Profile
Premium Member
Premium Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:24 pm
Posts: 2001
Location: Silicon Valley, California, USA
Rating: 1702 USCF
Rating Class: Class B (1600-1800)
Post 
Unfortunately, my wife had to reboot the computer today so I no longer have the data. I reran Fritz 8 with 20 seconds per move (instead of 300) and it came back with:

1. Bxc4 +5.25
2. Bxg4 +4.68

Looks like the order got flipped and the magnitudes are very different from what I remember.

L8erz...
=wild=

_________________
I know you believe you understand what you think I just said, but you may not realize what I implied is not what you inferred.


Tue Dec 11, 2007 2:53 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 13 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF