Just a 10min game dunno if it's interesting. I looked over the game with rybka and add my analysis.

[Event "unrated blitz match"]
[Site "Free Internet Chess Server"]
[Date "2010.07.16"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Zigg"]
[Black "NN"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "A07"]
[PlyCount "34"]
[EventDate "2010.??.??"]
[TimeControl "600"]

1. Nf3 d5 2. g3 Nc6 3. d4 f6 4. Bg2 e5 5. O-O e4 6. Ne1 f5 7. c4 Nf6 8. Nc3 Bb4
9. Nc2 Bxc3 10. bxc3 dxc4 11. Ba3 Nd5 12. Qd2 Be6 13. Rab1 b6 14. f3 Nf6 15.
Rfd1 $2 (15. Qg5 $1 $16 Rg8 16. fxe4 Nxe4 17. Qf4 g5 18. Qe3 Qd5 19. g4 $1
O-O-O 20. gxf5 Bxf5 21. Rxf5 Qxf5 22. Bxe4 Qg4+ 23. Bg2 Rg6 24. Qf3) 15... Bd5
$2 (15... Qd7 $11) 16. Ne3 Ne7 17. Bxe7 Qxe7 {NN resigns} 1-0

Hey Dennis,

I don't know if this game analysis is going on still, but judging by your latest video, I assume it is

Here is my Team 45 45 League game from a little while ago:

[Event "Team 45 45 League T45"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[Date "2010.05.29"]
[Round "4"]
[White "kobesarmy"]
[Black "Ser-Enigma"]
[Result "0-1"]
[BlackElo "2119"]
[ECO "A20"]
[TimeControl "2700+45"]
[WhiteElo "1931"]

{[%t Long] 2050 FIDE} 1. c4 {0:45:45} 1... e5 {0:45:32} 2. g3 {0:46:26} 2...
Nf6 {0:46:13} 3. Bg2 {0:47:08} 3... d5 {0:46:17} 4. cxd5 {0:47:50} 4... Nxd5
{0:46:59} 5. Nf3 {0:48:30} 5... Nc6 {0:47:28} 6. O-O {0:49:10} 6... Be6
{0:47:20} 7. d4 {0:49:48} 7... exd4 {0:47:42} 8. Nxd4 {0:50:16} 8... Nxd4
{0:48:25} 9. Qxd4 {0:50:58} 9... c6 {0:48:42} 10. Nc3 {0:47:53} 10... Qb6
{0:46:33} 11. Qa4 {0:43:00} (11. Qe5) 11... Qb4 {0:38:20} 12. Qxb4 {0:36:44}
(12. Qc2 Nf6 (12... Qc5 13. Bxd5 cxd5 14. Be3)13. Bd2) 12... Nxb4 {0:35:29} 13.
Bf4 {0:34:03} 13... Rd8 {0:29:09} 14. Rfd1 {0:31:51} 14... Be7 {0:28:03} 15. a3
{0:30:40} (15. Rxd8+ Kxd8 16. Be3 Nc2 17. Rd1+ Kc7 18. Bf4+) 15... Na6
{0:23:23} 16. b4 {0:27:27} 16... O-O {0:23:56 Here I held that white must be
better, and looking at the pawn structure, I felt that b5 would be a
breakthrough move, clearly it was premature here from the game continuation,
but here, what are the signs, aside from brute calculaton, are there any signs
that should call out to me: "hey, build up more before playing b5!" } 17. b5
{0:25:03} (17. Rab1 Rxd1+ 18. Rxd1 h6)(17. Ne4 Bd5 18. Rac1 f5 19. Nd2) 17...
Nc5 {0:20:47} 18. bxc6 {0:21:12} 18... bxc6 {0:21:26} 19. Bxc6 {0:19:30} (19.
Bc7 Rxd1+ 20. Rxd1 Rc8 21. Bd6) 19... Nb3 {0:20:31} (19... Bf6 {[%t Ctrl] þ^4
^0 ^0 ^0 } 20. Rac1 {[%t Ctrl] þ^4 ^0 ^0 ^0 } 20... Nb3 {[%t Ctrl] þ^4 ^0 ^0 ^0
} 21. Ne4 {[%t Ctrl] þ^4 ^0 ^0 ^0 } 21... Nxc1 {[%t Ctrl] þ^4 ^0 ^0 ^0 } 22.
Nxf6+ {[%t Ctrl] þ^4 ^0 ^0 ^0 } 22... gxf6 {[%t Ctrl] þ^4 ^0 ^0 ^0 } 23. Rxc1
{[%t Ctrl] þ^4 ^0 ^0 ^0 } 23... Rc8 {[%t Ctrl] þ^4 ^0 ^0 ^0 } 24. f3 {[%t Ctrl]
þ^4 ^0 ^0 ^0 } 24... Rfd8 {[%t Ctrl] þ^4 ^0 ^0 ^0 } 25. Kf2 {[%t Ctrl] þ^4 ^0
^0 ^0 } 25... h5 {[%t Ctrl] þ^4 ^0 ^0 ^0 } 26. Be3 {[%t Ctrl] þ^4 ^0 ^0 ^0 }
26... Bd5 {(0:00.02)}{[%eval -35,12,Rybka 3 1-cpu w32]}{[%t Ctrl] þ^4 ^0 ^0 ^0
}) 20. Rxd8 {0:19:06} (20. Rab1 {(0:00.00)}{[%eval 32,10,Rybka 3 1-cpu w32]}
{[%t Ctrl] þ^4 ^0 ^0 ^0 }) 20... Rxd8 {0:21:05} 21. Rd1 {0:19:46} 21... Rxd1+
{0:18:33} 22. Nxd1 {0:20:25} 22... Nd4 {0:18:33} 23. Bf3 {0:20:01} 23... Nxf3+
{0:19:05} 24. exf3 {0:20:43} 24... Bxa3 {0:19:48} 25. Kf1 {0:21:19} 25... Bb4
{0:20:02} 26. Ke2 {0:21:46} 26... Bc4+ {0:20:04} 27. Ke3 {0:22:26} 27... Bb3
{0:20:44} 28. Nb2 {0:22:59} 28... a5 {0:18:56} 29. Nd3 {0:23:27} 29... Be7
{0:18:57} 30. Kd4 {0:23:30} 30... a4 {0:19:13} 31. Kc3 {0:24:10} (31. Nc5 Bd1
32. Bc1) 31... Bd5 {0:18:51} 32. Nb4 {0:23:11} 32... Bxf3 {0:19:11} 33. Bd2
{0:22:52} 33... Bf6+ {0:18:49} 34. Kc2 {0:22:49} 34... Be4+ {0:19:21} 35. Kc1
{0:23:29} 35... a3 {0:18:56} 36. Na2 {0:22:51} 36... Bb2+ {0:18:55} 37. Kd1
{0:23:35} 37... Bd5 {0:19:27}{White resigns} 0-1

The times are listed and also my analysis moves and one annotation question. I achieved a quite solid position, looking for a plan to win, but managed to botch it up in a matter of moves and lost. I missed a possibly drawing move in the ending, but I gave up hope because our team match was lost if I drew,I was playing for a win, and while i was upset that the queens left the board so early, I was happy with some decent chances after move 16.

[Event "GG Rapid"]
[Date "2010.08.01"]
[Round "2"]
[White "JW"]
[Black "MM"]
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "1829"]
[BlackElo "1903"]
[Time "25:00"]
[TimeControl "25 min"]

1. e4 g6 2. d4 Bg7 3. Nf3 c5 4. e5 Qb6 5. c3 Nc6 6. Be2 a6 7. O-O Nh6 8. Nbd2 Nf5 9. Nb3 cxd4 10. Nbxd4 Ncxd4 11. cxd4 O-O 12. b3 d5 13. Bb2 e6 14. Rc1 Bd7 15. Rc2 Bb5 16. Bxb5 axb5 17. Ba1 Ra6 18. g4 Ne7 19. h3 Rfa8 20. Qd2 Nc6 21. Rfc1 Nb4 22. Rc8+ Rxc8 23. Rxc8+ Bf8 24. Qh6 1-0

Hi Dennis. I was hoping you could look at this game for me which is from a rapidplay event I had recently here in London. I have never liked playing against the Modern and feel I got a bit lucky in this game e.g. the move 12. ... d5 seems poor from Black and I didn't see the point of him playing 17. ... Ra6 (but my computer says it is ok). How do you approach play against these wing openings with white? Finally, my computer was "screaming" for me to play g4 much earlier on than I did. Can you explain why? Finally, the clear blunder at the end (21 ... Nb4) let me in for a nice finish yes?

Thanks for your time on this game and I look forward to hearing from you in an upcoming show.

John.

Hi and thanks for your work here!

I had this position in a recent game.



I played kg4 and he bc7
Unbelivable it seems to be a draw, at least I couldnt find a win for white in the analysis. Am I right?
And the computer suggests bg5 instead of bc7 but even in this line I couldnt find a win.

Hi, Dennis!!!
I have been experimenting with some rare Gruenfeld lines with White. Here is one game where I played an early Bg5 in the Exchange variation. Wanted to know if it is sound.

[Event "Internet"]
[Site "playchess"]
[Date "2010.08.07"]
[EventDate "2010.08.07"]
[Round "?"]
[Result "1-0"]
[White "Krumow"]
[Black "Yatsenko"]
[ECO "D85"]
[PlyCount "49"]

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3. Nc3 d5 4.cxd5 Nxd5 5.e4 Nxc3 6. bxc3 Bg7 7.Bg5 c5 8.Rc1 Qa5 9.Qd2 cxd4 10.cxd4 Qxd2 11.Kxd2 Nc6 12.Bb5 Bd7 13.d5 Ne5 14.Bxd7 Kxd7 15.f4 Ng4 16. Ke2 Rac8 17.Nf3 Rxc1 18.Rxc1 f6 19.Bh4 Rc8 20.Rxc8 Kxc8 21.Nd4 g5 22.h3 gxh4 23.hxg4 Bh6 24. Ne6 Kd7 25.g5 1-0

Would be 17...Bb2 and 21.h3.. an improvement for Black and White respectively?

Thanks in advance!

Event: US Open
Date: 8-6-10
Round: 6
White: J. Zhu 2057
Black: M. Souza 1850

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Bc4 Nf6 5.Ng5 d5 6.exd5 Na5 7.Bb5+ Bd7 8.Bxd7+ Qxd7 9.Qxd4 Qxd5 10.Qe3+ Be7 11.0-0 h6 12.Nf3 Nc6 13.Nc3 Qc5 14.Qe2 0-0-0 15.Be3 Qh5 16.Rfd1 Bd6 17.Qc4 Ne5 18.Nxe5 Bxe5 19.Rxd8+ Rxd8 20.h3 a6 21.Re1 g5 22.Bb6 Bd6 23.Bd4 Re8 24.Qf1 Qg6 25.Bxf6 Rxe1 26.Qxe1 Qxf6 27.Qe8+ Qd8 28. Qxf7 Qf8 29.Qxf8+ Bxf8 30.Kf1 Kd7 31.Ke2 Ke6 32.Kf3 h5 33.Ne4 Kf5 34.Ng3 Kg6 35.Ke4 h4 36.Nf5 Bc5 37.f5 b6 38.c3 a5 39.Nd4 Bd6 40.fxg5 Kxg5 41.Nf3+ Kh5 42.Kf5 Bg3 43.Nd4 Bd6 44.Ne2 Bh2 45.Kxh4 Kf5 46.Nc3 Bf4 (At this point I'm in severe time trouble and lost a few moves later)

Hi Dennis,

I have two questions about this game. The first has to do with the middle game. For some reason I seem to lose a lot in open positions like this one. I felt like I was better for most of the game but all of a sudden my position just collapsed! I know that 22.Bb6 and 23.Bd4 couldn't have been THAT strong of a combination, right?! I just couldn't come up with a refutation over the board though... I guess I should've just played 23. Qg6 and held it together instead of 23. ...Re8 (i didn't see 24.Qf1!) but it seemed like my attack just died.

That said, can you give me some general principles to to follow in open positions such as these? should I not have been in such a rush to try 21. ...g5?

Secondly, after I lost the pawn against that tactic, I figured that I might be able to hold a draw if I could get the queens off of the board. To my surprise my opponent obliged me on the first try! Is there any way to salvage the half point in this pawn down endgame? surely my bishop is better than his knight in an open position like this, right?

Thanks very much for your time... I look forward to you picking my game apart!

Matt Souza

Hello Dennis

here i have a finalround game of a city open here which i won. I would like to ask you if you can analyse it and look for improvements for both sides and if this attack was premature. I actually won that game but it is far beyond my sight if this attack was actually correct or if it was a double edged sword.
i've been lawas


[Event "Finalround // City Open 2010"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2010.08.17"]
[Round "?"]
[White "N., N.."]
[Black "Lawas"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C42"]
[WhiteElo "1789"]
[BlackElo "1559"]
[Annotator "-,-"]
[PlyCount "52"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. d3 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. Bd2 Bxc3 7. Bxc3 Nxc3
8. bxc3 O-O 9. Be2 Nc6 10. O-O Be6 11. Re1 f5 12. d4 e4 13. Ne5 Nxe5 14. dxe5
Qg5 15. Qd4 Rad8 16. Qxa7 f4 17. Qxb7 f3 18. Bf1 fxg2 19. Bxg2 Rxf2 20. Qxe4
Rdd2 21. Qa8+ Rf8 22. Qc6 Bd5 23. Qxd5+ Rxd5 24. Kh1 Rd2 25. Rg1 Qxe5 26. c4
Rxg2 0-1

Hi Dennis, i just played a scary game, this game almost gave me a heartattack, because it was from white's winning to drawish to black's better to drawish to white's having huge advandage to black has a checkmate in 5.

[White "motor07"]
[Black "wuzhe"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Result "0-1"]

1.e4 c5 2.f4 Nc6 3.Nf3 d6 4.Bc4 g6 5.O-O Bg7 6.e5 dxe5 7.fxe5 e6 8.d4 cxd4 9.Ng5 Nxe5 10.Bf4 Bf6 11.Bxe5 Bxe5 12.Nxf7 Qc7 13.Nxh8 Bxh2+ 14.Kh1 Nf6 15.Qf3 Be5 16.Bd3 Bd7 17.Nxg6 hxg6 18.Bxg6+ Ke7 19.Nd2 Bc6 20.Ne4 Rh8+ 21.Kg1 Bh2+ 22.Kf2 Bg3+ 23.Ke2 Bb5+ 24.Kd2 Bxf1 25.Qxf6+ Kd7 26.Qxh8 Qf4+ 27.Kd1 Qg4+ 28.Kc1 Bf4+ 29.Nd2 Bxd2+ 30.Kxd2 Qe2+ 31.Kc1 Qe1#
0-1

i know we made a lot mistakes, it was a blitz game, so...
If you could help me analyze this game, that would be great! thank you.

Hi Dennis,

Here is one of my games from a recent tournament. I'm normally a solid player so this game while quite positional had some relatively interesting tactics and is a game where some pointers or learning points on playing these types of fluid positions would be of great help.

I have analyzed it myself but sometimes it takes a critical eye to go over it and find what I can't see.

I've left the annotations blank with just a few comments on the tournament itself and my main initial opening choice.


[Event "e2e4.org.uk Uxbridge Major G"]
[Site "Denham Grove Hotel, Uxbridge,"]
[Date "2010.08.14"]
[Round "7"]
[White "Grant, David"]
[Black "Bishop, Geoffrey L"]
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "1851"]
[BlackElo "1852"]
[PlyCount "59"]
[EventDate "2010.08.??"]
[EventType "tourn"]
[EventRounds "9"]
[Source "Chess Scotland"]
[SourceDate "2010.07.21"]

{Time Control is all moves in 90 minutes with 30 second a move increments.
Round 7 of an All play All Event. This is the 2nd game of the day where I had
agreed a relatively short draw in the morning round in an level position.
Being relatively fresh I was certainly looking for a win in this game.
Especially has he had beaten me 6 months before.} 1. e4 e5 {Geoffrey is a
Sicilian player. I had prepared quite extensively before coming to this
tournament for c5. Now the question was has he prepared for me ?} 2. Nc3 Nc6 {
Here I thought for a good 10 minutes about how I wanted to play it. Bc4 and f4
are the main ideas. I like the g3 lines but thats best against Nf6 rather than
Nc6. Still I could play it as it most often transposes anyway. Eventually I
went with f4 which is just a superior kings gambit in the hope that being a
Sicilian player this would really take him out his depth.} 3. f4 exf4 4. Nf3 d6
5. d4 Bg4 6. Bxf4 Bxf3 7. gxf3 Nf6 8. Qd2 Ne7 9. O-O-O Ng6 10. Be3 Be7 11. Bc4
c6 12. h4 b5 13. Bb3 a5 14. h5 Nf8 15. a4 b4 16. Qg2 Rg8 17. Ne2 Ne6 18. f4 d5
19. f5 Nc7 20. e5 Ne4 21. Rdg1 c5 22. dxc5 Bxc5 23. Bxc5 Nxc5 24. Nd4 Nxb3+ 25.
cxb3 Na6 26. Nb5 Qc8+ 27. Kb1 Qxf5+ 28. Ka2 Kf8 29. Qxd5 Qc8 30. Nd6 {
I eventually went on to finish the tournament with 6/9 with 3 wins 6 draws and
no loses coming 2nd=. Most of my games were solid affairs trying to outplay my
opponents but this is one of the ones where I loosened up a bit and took a bit
more risk and got some joy from it.} 1-0

Just ONE game!

[White]
[Black "cheVelle"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Opening "Ruy Lopez: Marshall counter-attack"]
[ECO "C89"]
[NIC "RL.17"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 O-O 8.
c3 d5 9. d4 exd4 10. e5 Ne4 11. Nxd4 Nxd4 12. cxd4 Be6 13. f3 Ng5 14. h4
Nxf3+ 15. Qxf3 Bxh4 16. Rd1 f6 17. Qh5 fxe5 18. Qxe5 Bf2+ 19. Kh1 Qd7 20.
Bc2 Bf5 21. Bb3 Be4 22. Qxe4 Kh8 23. Qd3 Rf5 24. Qh3 Qf7 25. g4 Rf3 26. Qh5
Qe7 27. Nc3 Raf8 28. Bxd5 Bxd4 29. Bxf3 Rxf3 30. Bg5 Qd7 31. Rxd4 {White
wins} 1-0

This is a game I played in the Najdorf Sicilian. I don't really know the theory very well, and in these aggressive openings I often don't know the best way to continue the attack. Obviously my opponent made a horrible blunder at the end.

[Event "ICC"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[Date "2010.10.16"]
[Round "?"]
[White "SONofCAISSA"]
[Black "Joanna"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A43"]
[WhiteElo "1523"]
[BlackElo "1582"]
[PlyCount "58"]
[EventDate "2010.??.??"]
[TimeControl "1800+30"]

1. d4 c5 2. c3 Nf6 3. Bf4 e6 4. e3 d5 5. Nf3 Nc6 6. Nbd2 Be7 7. h3 O-O 8. b3 a6
9. a4 Qa5 10. Qc2 h6 11. Bd3 cxd4 12. exd4 Bd7 13. O-O Rac8 14. Ne5 Nxd4 15.
Qd1 Rxc3 16. Bxh6 gxh6 17. Nxd7 Nxd7 18. Qg4+ Kh8 19. Qxd4+ Bf6 20. Qe3 Bg7 21.
Qe2 Ne5 22. Bb1 Qb4 23. Ba2 Rfc8 24. Qd1 Qf4 25. Re1 Rc2 26. Re2 Ng6 27. g3 Qb4
28. Nf3 Rxe2 29. Qxe2 Bxa1 0-1


Hei there Dennis. I won this game pretty easy. Not that I played that well, but I was lucky and won a pawn and a good position. It would be very nice if you could analyze this game.

I really like your videos on here. Thank you so much for all the good work you do.

Hi Dennis,

Would love to hear your thoughts on this game I managed to draw against GM John Emms at a recent 20 board simul. I have been improving quite rapidly the last couple of years (has a lot to do with watching your shows) and I managed to win the British U120 ECF Championship in August. But drawing against a GM, even in a simul, was something I never thought possible.

[Event "Simultaneoous"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2010.10.16"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Emms, John M"]
[Black "Hollands, George"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "B90"]
[WhiteElo "2482"]
[BlackElo "1714"]
[Annotator "Hollands"]
[PlyCount "94"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Bc4 a6 7. O-O Bg7 8. Re1 b5 9. Bb3 Bb7 10. a4 b4 11. Nd5 Nxd5 12. exd5 O-O 13. Bg5 Bf6 14. Bxf6 exf6 15. Qd2 a5 16. Qh6 Re8 17. Rxe8+ Qxe8 18. Nb5 Qe5 19. f4 Qe7 20. Kf2 Na6 21. Re1 Qd7 22. Re3 f5 23. Rh3 Nc5 24. Qxh7+ Kf8 25. Nd4 Ne4+ 26. Kg1 Nf6 27. Qh8+ Ke7 28. Qh4 Qd8 29. Re3+ Kd7 30. Nc6 Qb6 31. Qf2 Ne4 32. Rxe4 Qxf2+ 33. Kxf2 fxe4 34. h4 f5 35. Nd4 Ke7 36. Ke3 Kf6 37. Nb5 Ke7 38. Nd4 Rc8 39. g3 Rc5 40. Ne6 Rxd5 41. Bxd5 Bxd5 42. Nd4 Kd7 43. Ne2 Ke6 44. Kd4 Bc6 45. b3 Bd5 46. Ke3 Bc6 47. Kd4 Bd5 1/2-1/2

ChessNut1129 (1616) - delaney (1569)
Online Chess Chess.com

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6 4.0-0 Bb4 5.Bxc6 bxc6 6.Nxe5 0-0 7.d3 Re8 8.Nf3 d5 9.exd5 cxd5 10.Bg5 h6 11.Bh4 Rb8 12.a3 Bd6 13.b4 Bg4 14.Nbd2 c5 15.c3 a5 16.bxc5 Bxc5 17.Re1 Rxe1+ 18.Qxe1 Rb7 19.d4 Be7 20.a4 Qc8 21.Rb1 Rxb1 22.Nxb1 Bf8 23.Ne5 Bf5 24.h3 Nd7 25.Nxd7 Qxd7 26.Nd2 Qxa4 27.Nf3 Be6 28.Qb1 Qa3 29.Qc2 Qa1+ 30.Kh2 a4 31.Nd2 a3 32.Nb3 Qb2 33.Qxb2 axb2 34.Nd2 Bf5 35.g4 Be4 36.Kg3 Bd6+ 37.f4 g5 0-1


Hello Dennis,
This game I played the black side with the handle delaney. I think the time control was game in 15 min. My question is to how not to lose the opening or lose right out of the opening. In this game I dropped a pawn right away somehow. I lost the opening and should have lost the game but was fortunate to win back the pawn and eventually the game after my opponent made some mistakes. Thank you if I get to hear your thoughts on this and thanks for all your videos.

[Event "Oregon All Stars"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2010.10.08"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Ngyuen, Austin"]
[Black "Dalthorp, Matt"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B32"]
[WhiteElo "1590"]
[BlackElo "1563"]
[PlyCount "74"]
[EventDate "2010.??.??"]
[SourceDate "2010.10.08"]

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 e5 5. Nb5 d6 6.
c4 Be7 7. N1c3 a6 8. Na3 f5 9. Bd3 f4 10. g3 fxg3 11.
Qxf3 Nd4 11. hxg3 Nf6 12. Be3 Be6 13. Nd5 O-O
14. Nxf6+ Rxf6 15. Qh5 h6 16. O-O-O Nb4 17. Kb1 Rc8 18. Be2 Bf7 19. Qg4 Be6 20. Qh5 Bf7 21. Qh3 Bg6 22. Qg2 b5 23. cxb5 axb5 24. Bxb5 d5 25. f3 Qf8 26. Be2 Qf7 27. Ka1 dxe4 28. b3 exf3 29. Qh3
Ra8 30. Bc4 {"Whew! I got lucky on that one!" says White} Qxc4 31. bxc4 Rxa3 32. Qc8+ Kh7 33. Rh2 Rfa6 34. Rdd2 Rxe3 35. Qc7 Re1+ 36. Kb2 Rxa2+ 37. Kb3 Re3+ 0-1

Very fun attacking game with an intentional pawn sac and an accidental queen sac that is (still) totally winning but not obvious.