Minor Pieces
Both sides have two knights and a dark square bishop.
White's knights are poorly placed, and the g1 knight will have a very hard time finding a good square to move to. The e5 pawn really restricts its movement after the natural developing move, Ne2. Another idea is the maneuver Na3-f2-d3 to put pressure on the e5 pawn, but it seems very slow and black's attacking ideas will come quicker. White's bishop is very well posted and controls many squares.

Black's minor pieces are centrally posted and control many key squares. Black's darksquare bishop is functioning more or less as a giant pawn, guarding e5.

Pawn Structure:
Black has doubled pawns, but has the development advantage and centrally posted pieces. The doubled pawns control key squares on the board, and can't really be attacked all too well. Even if the white bishop made it to G3 or c3, the knights have no good squares to attack either of the pawns. Black also has two open files to work with.

White has a more solid pawn structure, but e4 can be quickly made a liability if black starts a minority attack along the h and g files. White has the open e-file and after developing the knight, can double the rooks and apply pressure.

King Safety
Both kings are reasonably safe. If black allows white to double up on the E-file, that might change. Black's king is rather well posted for an endgame.

Whoops, I missed that it was white to move. Now I gotta figure out how to get to that position and lose a tempo! sheesh

What do y'all think about this position? White to move.

...Queenside expansion is stopped by b4 when black plays b5...

It seems like black can put a rook on g8, play h4, then advance the g pawn, I don't see how the attack is stopped by g5, unless I'm missing something (which I probably am...)

"I'd say black has a rather significant positional advantage"

Black is playing this to draw, I have a hard time agreeing with the above statement, especially the significant part! I don't think there will be many takers for that statement.