View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:13 pm



Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
kamus - Blind Analysis: brilvis [36:22] 
Author Message
Video Manager
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 6:17 pm
Posts: 524
Post kamus - Blind Analysis: brilvis [36:22]
Poster: kamus
Rating Class: Class B (1600-1800) | Videos Made: 54
Login or register to rate this video...
Not Rated Yet!

NEW! Video Download: Login or register to download this video for your iPhone/iPod Touch



Sat Jun 05, 2010 12:45 pm
Profile
Knight

Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 4:49 am
Posts: 44
Rating: 1734
Rating Class: Class B (1600-1800)
Post Re: kamus - Blind Analysis: brilvis [36:22]
Hi kamus,

Thank you for analyzing my game. I enjoyed watching it. I was Black in this game and I played ...Nd4 on instinct, and with the knowledge that my opponent had difficulty playing under pressure. I especially liked the part where you said 'Black is playing like Rybka', which really put a smile on my face :).

By the way, I agree with you that it was a very weird opening choice by White. My opponent in this game always plays this setup with d3 and g3 so I was well prepared. And he knew that: I had played against him many times before; yet he played this line again. Well, I did not mind. ;)

Thanks again!


Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:36 pm
Profile
Premium Member
Premium Member

Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 221
Rating Class: Class C (1400-1600)
Post Re: kamus - Blind Analysis: brilvis [36:22]
On 22:10 Qb5 gets white smothered mated after Nf2+. Nice.


Sat Jun 05, 2010 2:34 pm
Profile
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 1:39 pm
Posts: 1158
Location: Maryland, USA
Rating: 1698
Rating Class: Class B (1600-1800)
Post Re: kamus - Blind Analysis: brilvis [36:22]
Yeah, Qb5 fails quite spectacularly.

Brilvis played a very nice game here- that sac, played on intuition, is very tough for white to deal with. Although Rybka may have been able to defend, the highest its move evaluation count for white ever got was never equal to the sacrificed piece. This was a fun game to analyze.

_________________
Il illigetimi est non carborundum.


Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:21 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 4 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF