View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Wed May 22, 2013 6:42 am



Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
thechesser - CVTV Tourney VI Eimaj vs Chesser [54:06] 
Author Message
Video Manager

Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 6:17 pm
Posts: 524
Post thechesser - CVTV Tourney VI Eimaj vs Chesser [54:06]
Poster: thechesser
Rating Class: Class C (1400-1600) | Videos Made: 133
Login or register to rate this video...
Average Rating: 5.00 (3)

Video Download: Login or register to download this video for your iPhone/iPod Touch

Like (Login Required)
Liked By: gentlewhisper, eimaj, Sarciness


Sat Jan 14, 2012 10:41 am
Profile
King

Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 2:38 am
Posts: 580
Rating: 1658 FIDE
Rating Class: Class A (1800-2000)
Post Re: thechesser - CVTV Tourney VI Eimaj vs Chesser [54:06]
Some thoughts (in addition to those I posted in Eimaj's version):

In the pre-game, you correctly state that 1.e4 c5 2.f4 d5! is well worth looking at for black. This is the Tal Gambit and is the reason very few GMs essay 2.f4, preferring 2.Nc3 if they want a Grand Prix.

On move 3 ...d6 is fine. The idea is to dominate the central dark-squares in conjunction with Bg7 and later Nd4. However, with white's Bb5, this is more difficult to achieve. An idea which I prefer is 3...e6 and a quick d5. This also gives the option of Nge7, which gets out of the way of white's e5 ideas and lends support to your c6-knight if white goes Bb5, as in the game. I think this plan of ...e6 ....d5 is good against most Closed Sicilians. You can even play 2...e6 against 2.Nc3.

I wasn't sure about your move ...a6. Why not play Bd7 and then if he takes you get ...Bxc6 when it's on a nice diagonal and not trapped behind your pawns like in the game.

Later on, you correctly spotted that your bishops wouldn't be too happy if the position closed. You allowed this to happen, however. I think the reason for this was that you played ...f5 to stop white from going f5. Whilst this is often a good plan for white in the Grand Prix, I think it's better to find your own counterplay becasue there's no good way that I know of to stop this idea except for going ...e6, which is a bit inconsistent with your 3...d6.
After the position closes (f5 and d5 from black against white's e5), I think white is clearly much better.

At 25:30, your Bf8 makes sense- defending the c5-pawn but how is black going to get his g8-knight and h8-rook into the game? I wonder if Ne7 is better, with the idea of giving up the c5-pawn, castling and getting those 2 into play, at the cost of a pawn.

At 30- a5 (trying to get the c8-bishop out) is an interesting idea, but looks too slow. You need that knight and h8-rook into the game. I would suggest Nd8 instead which is more consistent with your earlier play. At 31 you swap bishops, which brings his knight to c5 where it dominates your c8-bishop and makes ...a5 look a bit silly.
The consistent follow-up (after the bishop swap) with ...Rxb2 allows white the open file- maybe what you did (...Nd8) was best. Still, ...Rxb2 needs serious consideration.

I liked your Bd7 move! I like the follow-up Ke7- it allows your h8-rook into the game and prepares ...Nb7.

At 40:45, you NEED to look at ...c5. You had already spotted this idea earlier! Maybe it works tactically, maybe not but it's possible that this turns a loss into a win. You instantly swapped B for N and it's possible that this is the best move as you B was crap and ...c5 may not work, but you missed a chance to really stir things up.

At the end, it was a shame you fell for the fork. Although I think white is objectively lost for black, I'm sure at our level there are many ways for white to go wrong.

_________________
http://www.chessvideos.tv/wiki/index.php/Sarciness%27_Videos


Sat Jan 14, 2012 8:56 pm
Profile WWW
Premium Member
Premium Member

Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 4:04 pm
Posts: 318
Rating Class: Class B (1600-1800)
Post Re: thechesser - CVTV Tourney VI Eimaj vs Chesser [54:06]
Thought I'd post here a copy of my responses to Sarciness from my video of the game:

Sarciness wrote:
Thoughts whislt watching:

You were very good-humoured about his move 1 mouseslip. I think you sound like you're in a good place psyschologically.
Actually I think I remember the same mouseslip happening a few times in videos on this site - one was by Curtains perhaps, and the other may even have been thechesser? However, don't rely on my memory. I'm going to have to brush up on my Caro-Kann refutation - couldn't remember much about what to do


After he goes ...a6, it seems like he's encouraging you to do what you want-take on c6. This looks intuitively good for you (white)
Diagram 1: After 6.d3 (from the actual game):
Image
I agree, though Houdini doesn't complain. At least Black will have the open b-file to play with



At 12:20- he goes f5, this looks premature. After e5 he goes d5- things are closing up which looks very good for white's knights.
Diagram 2: After 8.0-0 (from the actual game):
Image
Houdini agrees and suggests e.g. 8...Nf6 or 8...Rb8



At 13:20- what about b3 followed by Bb2? Idea: gum up the b-file and get the bishop out of the way, on a good diagonal.
Hmm, you went Na4, c4. Wouldn't have thought of that at all! Doesn't look bad for white- the knights should be better than the bishops in the resulting position. I wonder what the future holds for that knight.
Diagram 3: After 9.e5 (from the actual game):
Image
The computer confirms my suspicion that 9...d5 is a mistake, but I don't like the look of it's suggested line 9...Nh6, after which 10.exd6 exd6 (otherwise Black's queenside pawn structure suffers) 11.Re1+ Kf7 12.Ng5+
Diagram 4: After 12.Ng5+ (from analysis):
Image
and Black has to retreat his king, restricting the h8 rook.

Diagram 5: After 9...d5 (from the actual game):
Image
10.b3 is a very decent alternative to 10.Na4 - I just went with what I saw



At 21:00 looks like your strategy of Na4, c4 is paying off!
Diagram 6: After 11...e6 (from the actual game):
Image
12.Qb3 worked out well, but Houdini finds 12.Be3 Bf8 13.b4!:
Diagram 7: After 13.b4! (from analysis):
Image
and Black's queen has to retreat, since both captures lose quickly: a) 13...cxb4? 14.Bb6 Bc5+ 15.Bxc5 wins at least a piece:
Diagram 8: After 15.Bxc5 (from analysis):
Image

and b) 13...Qxb4? 14.Rb1 Qa5 (14...Qa3 15.Qc2 threatens Bc1, trapping the queen) 15.Rb6 threatens Bd2, again trapping the queen:
Diagram 9: After 15.Rb6 (from analysis):
Image

For example then: 13...Qd8 14.Bxc5 Bxc5+ 15.Nxc5 with a very nice position for White:
Diagram 10: After 15.Nxc5 (from analysis):
Image

Diagram 11: After 13...Qc7 (from the actual game):
Image
I liked the idea of exchanging queens with 14.Qb6, but Houdini insists this throws away most of White's advantage, suggesting e.g. 14.Rac1, and if 14...Rb8 15.Ba5:
Diagram 12: After 15.Ba5 (from analysis):
Image
then if 15...Rxb3 16.Bxc7 Rxd3 17.cxd5:
Diagram 13: After 17.cxd5 (from analysis):
Image
then if 17...exd5 18.e6!
else if 17...cxd5 18.Nxc5
and if 17...Rxd5 18.Nb6
Simple, really =)



At 22:50- why not b3, then you get the c5-pawn for free, don't you? Then again, I guess Rxb2 is fine for white as you get the b-file.
His LS-bishop is pants with his pawn structure. I'm not sure he should exchange DS-bishops.
Diagram 14: After 18.Bb6 (from the actual game):
Image
Houdini suggests for Black (instead of 18...a5) the somewhat surprising: 18...Bh6 19.g3 g5 20.fxg5 Nxg5 21.b3:
Diagram 15: After 21.b3 (from analysis):
Image
and evaluates this as being ±.

Diagram 16: After 18...a5 (from the actual game):
Image
Yes, 19.b3 is a logical move. I wanted instead to encourage Black to capture on b2, as you mentioned.

A nice Houdini line demonstrating the potential perils of capturing on b2 (after 20.Nxc5):
Diagram 17: After 20.Nxc5 (from the actual game):
Image
is: 20...dxc4 21.dxc4 Rxb2:
Diagram 18: After 21...Rxb2 (from analysis):
Image
but now 22.Nd4 is very strong, e.g. 22...0–0 23.Nxc6 and if g5:
Diagram 19: After 23...g5 (from analysis):
Image
24.Rab1 Rc2 25.Rb8 Rxc4:
Diagram 20: After 25...Rxc4 (from analysis):
Image
26.Ne7+ and if Kh8 27.Nxe6 Re8:
Diagram 21: After 27...Re8 (from analysis):
Image
then 28.Nxc8 Rcxc8 29.Rxc8 Rxc8 30.Nxg5 Nxg5 31.fxg5:
Diagram 22: After 31.fxg5 (from analysis):
Image
Long variation, wrong variation? Larsen has a point perhaps, but sorry couldn't resist including it =)



At 25- looks like white is just crushing to me. Later he plays Bd7! looks like a good move to me. Idea (I guess) is Nb7.
Diagram 23: After 21.Nd4 (from the actual game):
Image
I thought my opponent fought hard in a very difficult position



At 30- I guess you go b4 anyhow- a3 was a good idea (as long as it works!) At 31- oh yeah, as you point out e6 is hanging. Missed that one. Still, it does allow him to trade off his crappy bishop- even if you do win a pawn.

At 33- after you take with the c-knight he instantly captures with the bishop- but did he have c5?
Diagram 24: After 23.Ncxe6 (from the actual game):
Image
Fortunately for White 23...c5 can be met with 24.Nc7+, but Houdini claims that after 23...dxc4 24.dxc4:
Diagram 25: After 24.dxc4 (from analysis):
Image
both 24...Ke7 and 24...a4 give Black fighting chances.

Diagram 26: After 22...Nb7 (from the actual game):
Image
Instead of 23.Ncxe6, Houdini gives a clinical line: 23.Na6 Rc8 24.cxd5 cxd5 (24...c5 25.dxe6) 25.Rfc1:
Diagram 27: After 25.Rfc1 (from analysis):
Image
and evaluates this as a winning position for White.



At 34- white blunders the exchange and a pawn and resigns.

Good game.

These were all as the game was playing. They may be stupid/ridiculous, but maybe some will provide food for thought.
Thanks for taking the time and effort - I've enjoyed trying to accurately respond

Cheers,
Sarc


Thanks thechesser/wuzhe for a hard fought game, gl in the rest of the tournament =)


Thu Jan 19, 2012 2:28 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 3 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF